Date   : Fri, 26 Jan 1996 22:13:55 +0000 (GMT)
From   : James Fidell <james@...>
Subject: Re: Would this work?

Chris Lam wrote:

> My opcode for D4 (normall unimplemented) simply called a function
> "unix_call()" instead of doing a nop.
> 
> The unix_call() function took the first byte after the D4 opcode as it's
> operation. Thus:

I think it's probably better to use the &x2 codes for these, because
most of them halt the processor when they're executed so it's pretty
safe to use them for other things.  &D4 does something, even though
it's undocumented.

James.

-- 
 "Yield to temptation --             | Work: james@...          
  it may not pass your way again"    | Play: james@...                 
                                     | http://www.OiT.co.uk/~james/
        - Lazarus Long               |              James Fidell